Skip to content

Github · GitHub Repository Radar

Agentic-Systems-Lab rigorous

A comprehensive suite of tools, built to liberate science by making the creation, evaluation, and dissemination of research more transparent, affordable, and efficient.

Stars

253

Inactive

Forks

20

Watchers: 253

Language

Python

License: MIT License

Repository Radar Score

29 / 100

Growth

7d
+0
30d
+0
%
0.0%

Not enough metric snapshots yet to chart growth for this repository.

Score breakdown

  • popularity 41
  • growth 0
  • activity 15
  • freshness 100
  • community 33

Need help integrating this stack?

Our team builds with modern open-source stacks. Tell us what you are shipping.

Get a quote →

Rigorous AI-Powered Scientific Manuscript Analysis

v0.2 Now Live: The latest version of the AI Reviewer (v0.2) is now available at https://www.rigorous.review/. Upload your manuscript, provide context on your target journal and receive structured feedback directly online via an interactive interface — now with progress tracking built in. Once initial testing of v0.2 is complete, we will make all module prompts open source to promote transparency and enable community contributions.

Help Us Improve! Please provide feedback via this short feedback form to help us improve the system.

Support AI Reviewer v0.3 by rocking some peer-reviewed merch 👕🧠 – grab yours here – GitHub contributors get free gear.

Vision

This repository is intended for tools that make the creation, evaluation, and distribution of scientific knowledge more transparent, cheaper, faster, and better. Let's build this future together!

Project Structure

  • Agent1_Peer_Review: Multiagent AI review system for comprehensive manuscript analysis, detailed feedback, and PDF report generation (v0.1).
  • Agent2_Outlet_Fit: (In Development) Tool for evaluating manuscript fit with target journals/conferences.

Current Status

Active Tools

  • Agent1_Peer_Review: ✅ v0.1 Ready for use!

In Development

  • Agent2_Outlet_Fit: 🚧 In Development
    • Core functionality being implemented
    • Integration with Agent1_Peer_Review in progress
    • Testing and validation ongoing
    • 🛠️ Development Plan

Future Modules and Ideas

  • Embedding-based similarity analysis (by @andjar): Use embeddings (as in The landscape of biomedical research) to compare a paper’s abstract with existing literature. This could help surface uncited but relevant work and suggest suitable journals based on similarity clusters.
  • Support for Drafting Reviewer Reponses.
  • Feedback on Research Proposals and Protocols.
  • AI-enabled document creation tool ("Cursor for Papers").

Requirements

  • Python 3.7+
  • OpenAI API key (the system can be adapted to alternative LLMs, including locally hosted ones)
  • PDF manuscripts to analyze
  • Dependencies listed in each tool's requirements.txt

Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to submit a Pull Request.

Citation

If you use the Rigorous AI Reviewer in your research or project, please cite:

@software{rigorous_ai_reviewer2025,
  author = {Jakob, Robert and O'Sullivan, Kevin},
  title = {Rigorous AI Reviewer: Enabling AI for Scientific Manuscript Analysis},
  year = {2025},
  publisher = {GitHub},
  url = {https://github.com/robertjakob/rigorous}
}

Team Image

Follow Robert
Follow Robert on LinkedIn Follow @robertjakob on X

Follow Kevin
Follow Kevin on LinkedIn

Made with ❤️ in Zurich

Created: Apr 9, 2025

Last push: Aug 8, 2025

Default branch: main

Languages

Share of the codebase by language, based on repository metadata from the host.

  • Python 100.0%

Repository Radar analysis

Deterministic insights derived from public metadata and our observations — not personal testing or reviews.

Why this repository is interesting

  • Listed in our discovery index with public GitHub metadata for analysis.

Who should use it

  • Developers working primarily with Python
  • Teams exploring AI tooling, agents, or ML infrastructure
  • Platform and DevOps engineers

Potential use cases

  • Reference or evaluate Python open-source approaches in this domain
  • Prototype AI/agent workflows or study reference architectures
  • Evaluate automation, CI/CD, or infrastructure patterns

Strengths

  • README present in our index
  • Declared license: MIT License

Limitations / considerations

  • Insights are derived from public metadata and our observations — not a substitute for code review

What to watch

  • Radar Score is modest — dig into activity and docs before committing

Source: GitHub (public metadata) + Repository Radar analysis. We do not claim ownership of third-party repositories.

Ready to ship something that compounds?

Share your roadmap. We’ll come back with scope options, timeline ranges, and who from Shriram IT Ventures should be in the room.

Popular with product teams